Library stdpp.base
This file collects type class interfaces, notations, and general theorems
that are used throughout the whole development. Most importantly it contains
abstract interfaces for ordered structures, sets, and various other data
structures.
From Coq Require Export Morphisms RelationClasses List Bool Setoid Peano Utf8.
From Coq Require Import Permutation.
Export ListNotations.
From Coq.Program Require Export Basics Syntax.
From stdpp Require Import options.
This notation is necessary to prevent length from being printed
as strings.length if strings.v is imported and later base.v. See
also strings.v and
https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/144 and
https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/129.
Enable implicit generalization.
This option enables implicit generalization in arguments of the form `{...} (i.e., anonymous arguments). Unfortunately, it also enables implicit generalization in Instance. We think that the fact that both behaviors are coupled together is a bug in Coq(https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/6030).
Global Generalizable All Variables.
Tweak program
1. Since we only use Program to solve logical side-conditions, they should always be made Opaque, otherwise we end up with performance problems due to Coq blindly unfolding them.
Global Unset Transparent Obligations.
2. Do not let Program automatically simplify obligations. The default
obligation tactic is Tactics.program_simpl, which, among other things,
introduces all variables and gives them fresh names. As such, it becomes
impossible to refer to hypotheses in a robust way.
Obligation Tactic := idtac.
3. Hide obligations from the results of the Search commands.
Add Search Blacklist "_obligation_".
Section seal.
Local Set Primitive Projections.
Record seal {A} (f : A) := { unseal : A; seal_eq : unseal = f }.
End seal.
Global Arguments unseal {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments seal_eq {_ _} _ : assert.
Local Set Primitive Projections.
Record seal {A} (f : A) := { unseal : A; seal_eq : unseal = f }.
End seal.
Global Arguments unseal {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments seal_eq {_ _} _ : assert.
Non-backtracking type classes
The type class TCNoBackTrack P can be used to establish P without ever backtracking on the instance of P that has been found. Backtracking may normally happen when P contains evars that could be instanciated in different ways depending on which instance is picked, and type class search somewhere else depends on this evar.
Class TCNoBackTrack (P : Prop) := { tc_no_backtrack : P }.
Global Hint Extern 0 (TCNoBackTrack _) ⇒ constructor; apply _ : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCIf (P Q R : Prop) : Prop :=
| TCIf_true : P → Q → TCIf P Q R
| TCIf_false : R → TCIf P Q R.
Existing Class TCIf.
Global Hint Extern 0 (TCIf _ _ _) ⇒
first [apply TCIf_true; [apply _|]
|apply TCIf_false] : typeclass_instances.
Global Hint Extern 0 (TCNoBackTrack _) ⇒ constructor; apply _ : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCIf (P Q R : Prop) : Prop :=
| TCIf_true : P → Q → TCIf P Q R
| TCIf_false : R → TCIf P Q R.
Existing Class TCIf.
Global Hint Extern 0 (TCIf _ _ _) ⇒
first [apply TCIf_true; [apply _|]
|apply TCIf_false] : typeclass_instances.
Typeclass opaque definitions
The constant tc_opaque is used to make definitions opaque for just type class search. Note that simpl is set up to always unfold tc_opaque.
Definition tc_opaque {A} (x : A) : A := x.
Typeclasses Opaque tc_opaque.
Global Arguments tc_opaque {_} _ /.
Typeclasses Opaque tc_opaque.
Global Arguments tc_opaque {_} _ /.
Below we define type class versions of the common logical operators. It is
important to note that we duplicate the definitions, and do not declare the
existing logical operators as type classes. That is, we do not say:
Existing Class or.
Existing Class and.
If we could define the existing logical operators as classes, there is no way
of disambiguating whether a premise of a lemma should be solved by type class
resolution or not.
These classes are useful for two purposes: writing complicated type class
premises in a more concise way, and for efficiency. For example, using the Or
class, instead of defining two instances P → Q1 → R and P → Q2 → R we could
have one instance P → Or Q1 Q2 → R. When we declare the instance that way, we
avoid the need to derive P twice.
Inductive TCOr (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop :=
| TCOr_l : P1 → TCOr P1 P2
| TCOr_r : P2 → TCOr P1 P2.
Existing Class TCOr.
Existing Instance TCOr_l | 9.
Existing Instance TCOr_r | 10.
Global Hint Mode TCOr ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCAnd (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop := TCAnd_intro : P1 → P2 → TCAnd P1 P2.
Existing Class TCAnd.
Existing Instance TCAnd_intro.
Global Hint Mode TCAnd ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCTrue : Prop := TCTrue_intro : TCTrue.
Existing Class TCTrue.
Existing Instance TCTrue_intro.
Inductive TCForall {A} (P : A → Prop) : list A → Prop :=
| TCForall_nil : TCForall P []
| TCForall_cons x xs : P x → TCForall P xs → TCForall P (x :: xs).
Existing Class TCForall.
Existing Instance TCForall_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall_cons.
Global Hint Mode TCForall ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
| TCOr_l : P1 → TCOr P1 P2
| TCOr_r : P2 → TCOr P1 P2.
Existing Class TCOr.
Existing Instance TCOr_l | 9.
Existing Instance TCOr_r | 10.
Global Hint Mode TCOr ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCAnd (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop := TCAnd_intro : P1 → P2 → TCAnd P1 P2.
Existing Class TCAnd.
Existing Instance TCAnd_intro.
Global Hint Mode TCAnd ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCTrue : Prop := TCTrue_intro : TCTrue.
Existing Class TCTrue.
Existing Instance TCTrue_intro.
Inductive TCForall {A} (P : A → Prop) : list A → Prop :=
| TCForall_nil : TCForall P []
| TCForall_cons x xs : P x → TCForall P xs → TCForall P (x :: xs).
Existing Class TCForall.
Existing Instance TCForall_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall_cons.
Global Hint Mode TCForall ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
The class TCForall2 P l k is commonly used to transform an input list l
into an output list k, or the converse. Therefore there are two modes, either
l input and k output, or k input and l input.
Inductive TCForall2 {A B} (P : A → B → Prop) : list A → list B → Prop :=
| TCForall2_nil : TCForall2 P [] []
| TCForall2_cons x y xs ys :
P x y → TCForall2 P xs ys → TCForall2 P (x :: xs) (y :: ys).
Existing Class TCForall2.
Existing Instance TCForall2_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall2_cons.
Global Hint Mode TCForall2 ! ! ! ! - : typeclass_instances.
Global Hint Mode TCForall2 ! ! ! - ! : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCElemOf {A} (x : A) : list A → Prop :=
| TCElemOf_here xs : TCElemOf x (x :: xs)
| TCElemOf_further y xs : TCElemOf x xs → TCElemOf x (y :: xs).
Existing Class TCElemOf.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_here.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_further.
Global Hint Mode TCElemOf ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
| TCForall2_nil : TCForall2 P [] []
| TCForall2_cons x y xs ys :
P x y → TCForall2 P xs ys → TCForall2 P (x :: xs) (y :: ys).
Existing Class TCForall2.
Existing Instance TCForall2_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall2_cons.
Global Hint Mode TCForall2 ! ! ! ! - : typeclass_instances.
Global Hint Mode TCForall2 ! ! ! - ! : typeclass_instances.
Inductive TCElemOf {A} (x : A) : list A → Prop :=
| TCElemOf_here xs : TCElemOf x (x :: xs)
| TCElemOf_further y xs : TCElemOf x xs → TCElemOf x (y :: xs).
Existing Class TCElemOf.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_here.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_further.
Global Hint Mode TCElemOf ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
We declare both arguments x and y of TCEq x y as outputs, which means
TCEq can also be used to unify evars. This is harmless: since the only
instance of TCEq is TCEq_refl below, it can never cause loops. See
https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/iris/merge_requests/391 for a use case.
Inductive TCEq {A} (x : A) : A → Prop := TCEq_refl : TCEq x x.
Existing Class TCEq.
Existing Instance TCEq_refl.
Global Hint Mode TCEq ! - - : typeclass_instances.
Lemma TCEq_eq {A} (x1 x2 : A) : TCEq x1 x2 ↔ x1 = x2.
Proof. split; destruct 1; reflexivity. Qed.
Inductive TCDiag {A} (C : A → Prop) : A → A → Prop :=
| TCDiag_diag x : C x → TCDiag C x x.
Existing Class TCDiag.
Existing Instance TCDiag_diag.
Global Hint Mode TCDiag ! ! ! - : typeclass_instances.
Global Hint Mode TCDiag ! ! - ! : typeclass_instances.
Existing Class TCEq.
Existing Instance TCEq_refl.
Global Hint Mode TCEq ! - - : typeclass_instances.
Lemma TCEq_eq {A} (x1 x2 : A) : TCEq x1 x2 ↔ x1 = x2.
Proof. split; destruct 1; reflexivity. Qed.
Inductive TCDiag {A} (C : A → Prop) : A → A → Prop :=
| TCDiag_diag x : C x → TCDiag C x x.
Existing Class TCDiag.
Existing Instance TCDiag_diag.
Global Hint Mode TCDiag ! ! ! - : typeclass_instances.
Global Hint Mode TCDiag ! ! - ! : typeclass_instances.
Given a proposition P that is a type class, tc_to_bool P will return
true iff there is an instance of P. It is often useful in Ltac programming,
where one can do lazymatch tc_to_bool P with true ⇒ .. | false ⇒ .. end.
Throughout this development we use stdpp_scope for all general purpose
notations that do not belong to a more specific scope.
Declare Scope stdpp_scope.
Delimit Scope stdpp_scope with stdpp.
Global Open Scope stdpp_scope.
Delimit Scope stdpp_scope with stdpp.
Global Open Scope stdpp_scope.
Change True and False into notations in order to enable overloading.
We will use this to give True and False a different interpretation for
embedded logics.
Notation "'True'" := True (format "True") : type_scope.
Notation "'False'" := False (format "False") : type_scope.
Notation "'False'" := False (format "False") : type_scope.
Change ∀ into a notation in order to enable overloading.
Notation "'forall' x .. y , P" := (∀ x, .. (∀ y, P) ..)
(at level 200, x binder, y binder, right associativity,
only parsing) : type_scope.
(at level 200, x binder, y binder, right associativity,
only parsing) : type_scope.
Notation "(=)" := eq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x =.)" := (eq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.= x )" := (λ y, eq y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠)" := (λ x y, x ≠ y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ≠.)" := (λ y, x ≠ y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≠ x )" := (λ y, y ≠ x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "=@{ A }" := (@eq A)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(=@{ A } )" := (@eq A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X =@{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≠@{ A } Y":= (¬X =@{ A } Y)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ = _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 100 (_ ≠ _) ⇒ discriminate : core.
Instance: ∀ A, PreOrder (=@{A}).
Proof. split; repeat intro; congruence. Qed.
Notation "( x =.)" := (eq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.= x )" := (λ y, eq y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠)" := (λ x y, x ≠ y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ≠.)" := (λ y, x ≠ y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≠ x )" := (λ y, y ≠ x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "=@{ A }" := (@eq A)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(=@{ A } )" := (@eq A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X =@{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≠@{ A } Y":= (¬X =@{ A } Y)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ = _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 100 (_ ≠ _) ⇒ discriminate : core.
Instance: ∀ A, PreOrder (=@{A}).
Proof. split; repeat intro; congruence. Qed.
Setoid equality
We define an operational type class for setoid equality, i.e., the "canonical" equivalence for a type. The typeclass is tied to the \equiv symbol. This is based on (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011).
Class Equiv A := equiv: relation A.
Infix "≡" := equiv (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "≡@{ A }" := (@equiv A _)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡)" := equiv (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≡.)" := (equiv X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≡ X )" := (λ Y, Y ≡ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢)" := (λ X Y, ¬X ≡ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢ Y":= (¬X ≡ Y) (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≢.)" := (λ Y, X ≢ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≢ X )" := (λ Y, Y ≢ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡@{ A } )" := (@equiv A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X ≡@{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢@{ A } Y":= (¬X ≡@{ A } Y)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "≡" := equiv (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "≡@{ A }" := (@equiv A _)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡)" := equiv (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≡.)" := (equiv X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≡ X )" := (λ Y, Y ≡ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢)" := (λ X Y, ¬X ≡ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢ Y":= (¬X ≡ Y) (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≢.)" := (λ Y, X ≢ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≢ X )" := (λ Y, Y ≢ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡@{ A } )" := (@equiv A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X ≡@{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢@{ A } Y":= (¬X ≡@{ A } Y)
(at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
The type class LeibnizEquiv collects setoid equalities that coincide
with Leibniz equality. We provide the tactic fold_leibniz to transform such
setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities, and unfold_leibniz for the
reverse.
Class LeibnizEquiv A `{Equiv A} := leibniz_equiv x y : x ≡ y → x = y.
Global Hint Mode LeibnizEquiv ! - : typeclass_instances.
Lemma leibniz_equiv_iff `{LeibnizEquiv A, !Reflexive (≡@{A})} (x y : A) :
x ≡ y ↔ x = y.
Proof. split; [apply leibniz_equiv|]. intros ->; reflexivity. Qed.
Ltac fold_leibniz := repeat
match goal with
| H : context [ _ ≡@{?A} _ ] |- _ ⇒
setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
| |- context [ _ ≡@{?A} _ ] ⇒
setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
end.
Ltac unfold_leibniz := repeat
match goal with
| H : context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] |- _ ⇒
setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
| |- context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] ⇒
setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
end.
Definition equivL {A} : Equiv A := (=).
Global Hint Mode LeibnizEquiv ! - : typeclass_instances.
Lemma leibniz_equiv_iff `{LeibnizEquiv A, !Reflexive (≡@{A})} (x y : A) :
x ≡ y ↔ x = y.
Proof. split; [apply leibniz_equiv|]. intros ->; reflexivity. Qed.
Ltac fold_leibniz := repeat
match goal with
| H : context [ _ ≡@{?A} _ ] |- _ ⇒
setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
| |- context [ _ ≡@{?A} _ ] ⇒
setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
end.
Ltac unfold_leibniz := repeat
match goal with
| H : context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] |- _ ⇒
setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
| |- context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] ⇒
setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
end.
Definition equivL {A} : Equiv A := (=).
A Params f n instance forces the setoid rewriting mechanism not to
rewrite in the first n arguments of the function f. We will declare such
instances for all operational type classes in this development.
The following instance forces setoid_replace to use setoid equality
(for types that have an Equiv instance) rather than the standard Leibniz
equality.
Global Instance equiv_default_relation `{Equiv A} : DefaultRelation (≡) | 3 := {}.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ≡ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ≡ _) ⇒ symmetry; assumption : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ≡ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ≡ _) ⇒ symmetry; assumption : core.
Type classes
Decidable propositions
This type class by (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011) collects decidable propositions.
Class Decision (P : Prop) := decide : {P} + {¬P}.
Global Hint Mode Decision ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments decide _ {_} : simpl never, assert.
Global Hint Mode Decision ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments decide _ {_} : simpl never, assert.
Although RelDecision R is just ∀ x y, Decision (R x y), we make this
an explicit class instead of a notation for two reasons:
- It allows us to control Hint Mode more precisely. In particular, if it were defined as a notation, the above Hint Mode for Decision would not prevent diverging instance search when looking for RelDecision (@eq ?A), which would result in it looking for Decision (@eq ?A x y), i.e. an instance where the head position of Decision is not en evar.
- We use it to avoid inefficient computation due to eager evaluation of propositions by vm_compute. This inefficiency arises for example if (x = y) := (f x = f y). Since decide (x = y) evaluates to decide (f x = f y), this would then lead to evaluation of f x and f y. Using the RelDecision, the f is hidden under a lambda, which prevents unnecessary evaluation.
Class RelDecision {A B} (R : A → B → Prop) :=
decide_rel x y :> Decision (R x y).
Global Hint Mode RelDecision ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments decide_rel {_ _} _ {_} _ _ : simpl never, assert.
Notation EqDecision A := (RelDecision (=@{A})).
decide_rel x y :> Decision (R x y).
Global Hint Mode RelDecision ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments decide_rel {_ _} _ {_} _ _ : simpl never, assert.
Notation EqDecision A := (RelDecision (=@{A})).
Class Inhabited (A : Type) : Type := populate { inhabitant : A }.
Global Hint Mode Inhabited ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments populate {_} _ : assert.
Global Hint Mode Inhabited ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments populate {_} _ : assert.
Proof irrelevant types
This type class collects types that are proof irrelevant. That means, all elements of the type are equal. We use this notion only used for propositions, but by universe polymorphism we can generalize it.
Class ProofIrrel (A : Type) : Prop := proof_irrel (x y : A) : x = y.
Global Hint Mode ProofIrrel ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Hint Mode ProofIrrel ! : typeclass_instances.
Common properties
These operational type classes allow us to refer to common mathematical properties in a generic way. For example, for injectivity of (k ++.) it allows us to write inj (k ++.) instead of app_inv_head k.
Class Inj {A B} (R : relation A) (S : relation B) (f : A → B) : Prop :=
inj x y : S (f x) (f y) → R x y.
Class Inj2 {A B C} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B)
(S : relation C) (f : A → B → C) : Prop :=
inj2 x1 x2 y1 y2 : S (f x1 x2) (f y1 y2) → R1 x1 y1 ∧ R2 x2 y2.
Class Cancel {A B} (S : relation B) (f : A → B) (g : B → A) : Prop :=
cancel : ∀ x, S (f (g x)) x.
Class Surj {A B} (R : relation B) (f : A → B) :=
surj y : ∃ x, R (f x) y.
Class IdemP {A} (R : relation A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
idemp x : R (f x x) x.
Class Comm {A B} (R : relation A) (f : B → B → A) : Prop :=
comm x y : R (f x y) (f y x).
Class LeftId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
left_id x : R (f i x) x.
Class RightId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
right_id x : R (f x i) x.
Class Assoc {A} (R : relation A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
assoc x y z : R (f x (f y z)) (f (f x y) z).
Class LeftAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
left_absorb x : R (f i x) i.
Class RightAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
right_absorb x : R (f x i) i.
Class AntiSymm {A} (R S : relation A) : Prop :=
anti_symm x y : S x y → S y x → R x y.
Class Total {A} (R : relation A) := total x y : R x y ∨ R y x.
Class Trichotomy {A} (R : relation A) :=
trichotomy x y : R x y ∨ x = y ∨ R y x.
Class TrichotomyT {A} (R : relation A) :=
trichotomyT x y : {R x y} + {x = y} + {R y x}.
Notation Involutive R f := (Cancel R f f).
Lemma involutive {A} {R : relation A} (f : A → A) `{Involutive R f} x :
R (f (f x)) x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Global Arguments irreflexivity {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments inj {_ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments inj2 {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ _: assert.
Global Arguments cancel {_ _ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments surj {_ _ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments idemp {_ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments comm {_ _ _} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments left_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments right_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments assoc {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments left_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments right_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments anti_symm {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments total {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments trichotomy {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments trichotomyT {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Lemma not_symmetry `{R : relation A, !Symmetric R} x y : ¬R x y → ¬R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma symmetry_iff `(R : relation A) `{!Symmetric R} x y : R x y ↔ R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj `{Inj A B R R' f} x y : ¬R x y → ¬R' (f x) (f y).
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_1 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
¬R x1 x2 → ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_2 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
¬R' y1 y2 → ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR' HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma inj_iff {A B} {R : relation A} {S : relation B} (f : A → B)
`{!Inj R S f} `{!Proper (R ==> S) f} x y : S (f x) (f y) ↔ R x y.
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Global Instance inj2_inj_1 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} y : Inj R1 R3 (λ x, f x y).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Global Instance inj2_inj_2 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} x : Inj R2 R3 (f x).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Lemma cancel_inj `{Cancel A B R1 f g, !Equivalence R1, !Proper (R2 ==> R1) f} :
Inj R1 R2 g.
Proof.
intros x y E. rewrite <-(cancel f g x), <-(cancel f g y), E. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma cancel_surj `{Cancel A B R1 f g} : Surj R1 f.
Proof. intros y. ∃ (g y). auto. Qed.
inj x y : S (f x) (f y) → R x y.
Class Inj2 {A B C} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B)
(S : relation C) (f : A → B → C) : Prop :=
inj2 x1 x2 y1 y2 : S (f x1 x2) (f y1 y2) → R1 x1 y1 ∧ R2 x2 y2.
Class Cancel {A B} (S : relation B) (f : A → B) (g : B → A) : Prop :=
cancel : ∀ x, S (f (g x)) x.
Class Surj {A B} (R : relation B) (f : A → B) :=
surj y : ∃ x, R (f x) y.
Class IdemP {A} (R : relation A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
idemp x : R (f x x) x.
Class Comm {A B} (R : relation A) (f : B → B → A) : Prop :=
comm x y : R (f x y) (f y x).
Class LeftId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
left_id x : R (f i x) x.
Class RightId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
right_id x : R (f x i) x.
Class Assoc {A} (R : relation A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
assoc x y z : R (f x (f y z)) (f (f x y) z).
Class LeftAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
left_absorb x : R (f i x) i.
Class RightAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A → A → A) : Prop :=
right_absorb x : R (f x i) i.
Class AntiSymm {A} (R S : relation A) : Prop :=
anti_symm x y : S x y → S y x → R x y.
Class Total {A} (R : relation A) := total x y : R x y ∨ R y x.
Class Trichotomy {A} (R : relation A) :=
trichotomy x y : R x y ∨ x = y ∨ R y x.
Class TrichotomyT {A} (R : relation A) :=
trichotomyT x y : {R x y} + {x = y} + {R y x}.
Notation Involutive R f := (Cancel R f f).
Lemma involutive {A} {R : relation A} (f : A → A) `{Involutive R f} x :
R (f (f x)) x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Global Arguments irreflexivity {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments inj {_ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments inj2 {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ _: assert.
Global Arguments cancel {_ _ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments surj {_ _ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments idemp {_ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments comm {_ _ _} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments left_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments right_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments assoc {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments left_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments right_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Global Arguments anti_symm {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments total {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments trichotomy {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments trichotomyT {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Lemma not_symmetry `{R : relation A, !Symmetric R} x y : ¬R x y → ¬R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma symmetry_iff `(R : relation A) `{!Symmetric R} x y : R x y ↔ R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj `{Inj A B R R' f} x y : ¬R x y → ¬R' (f x) (f y).
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_1 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
¬R x1 x2 → ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_2 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
¬R' y1 y2 → ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR' HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma inj_iff {A B} {R : relation A} {S : relation B} (f : A → B)
`{!Inj R S f} `{!Proper (R ==> S) f} x y : S (f x) (f y) ↔ R x y.
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Global Instance inj2_inj_1 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} y : Inj R1 R3 (λ x, f x y).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Global Instance inj2_inj_2 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} x : Inj R2 R3 (f x).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Lemma cancel_inj `{Cancel A B R1 f g, !Equivalence R1, !Proper (R2 ==> R1) f} :
Inj R1 R2 g.
Proof.
intros x y E. rewrite <-(cancel f g x), <-(cancel f g y), E. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma cancel_surj `{Cancel A B R1 f g} : Surj R1 f.
Proof. intros y. ∃ (g y). auto. Qed.
The following lemmas are specific versions of the projections of the above
type classes for Leibniz equality. These lemmas allow us to enforce Coq not to
use the setoid rewriting mechanism.
Lemma idemp_L {A} f `{!@IdemP A (=) f} x : f x x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma comm_L {A B} f `{!@Comm A B (=) f} x y : f x y = f y x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_id_L {A} i f `{!@LeftId A (=) i f} x : f i x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_id_L {A} i f `{!@RightId A (=) i f} x : f x i = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma assoc_L {A} f `{!@Assoc A (=) f} x y z : f x (f y z) = f (f x y) z.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@LeftAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f i x = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@RightAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f x i = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma comm_L {A B} f `{!@Comm A B (=) f} x y : f x y = f y x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_id_L {A} i f `{!@LeftId A (=) i f} x : f i x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_id_L {A} i f `{!@RightId A (=) i f} x : f x i = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma assoc_L {A} f `{!@Assoc A (=) f} x y z : f x (f y z) = f (f x y) z.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@LeftAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f i x = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@RightAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f x i = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Generic orders
The classes PreOrder, PartialOrder, and TotalOrder use an arbitrary relation R instead of ⊆ to support multiple orders on the same type.
Definition strict {A} (R : relation A) : relation A := λ X Y, R X Y ∧ ¬R Y X.
Instance: Params (@strict) 2 := {}.
Class PartialOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
partial_order_pre :> PreOrder R;
partial_order_anti_symm :> AntiSymm (=) R
}.
Class TotalOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
total_order_partial :> PartialOrder R;
total_order_trichotomy :> Trichotomy (strict R)
}.
Instance: Params (@strict) 2 := {}.
Class PartialOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
partial_order_pre :> PreOrder R;
partial_order_anti_symm :> AntiSymm (=) R
}.
Class TotalOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
total_order_partial :> PartialOrder R;
total_order_trichotomy :> Trichotomy (strict R)
}.
Global Instance prop_inhabited : Inhabited Prop := populate True.
Notation "(∧)" := and (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∧.)" := (and A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∧ B )" := (λ A, A ∧ B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∨)" := or (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∨.)" := (or A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∨ B )" := (λ A, A ∨ B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(↔)" := iff (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ↔.)" := (iff A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.↔ B )" := (λ A, A ↔ B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ↔ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ↔ _) ⇒ symmetry; assumption : core.
Lemma or_l P Q : ¬Q → P ∨ Q ↔ P.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma or_r P Q : ¬P → P ∨ Q ↔ Q.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_l (P Q : Prop) : (Q → P) → Q → (P ∧ Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_r (P Q : Prop) : P → (P → Q) → (P ∧ Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma impl_transitive (P Q R : Prop) : (P → Q) → (Q → R) → (P → R).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma forall_proper {A} (P Q : A → Prop) :
(∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) → (∀ x, P x) ↔ (∀ x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Lemma exist_proper {A} (P Q : A → Prop) :
(∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) → (∃ x, P x) ↔ (∃ x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Global Instance eq_comm {A} : Comm (↔) (=@{A}).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance flip_eq_comm {A} : Comm (↔) (λ x y, y =@{A} x).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance iff_comm : Comm (↔) (↔).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_comm : Comm (↔) (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_assoc : Assoc (↔) (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_idemp : IdemP (↔) (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_comm : Comm (↔) (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_assoc : Assoc (↔) (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_idemp : IdemP (↔) (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance True_and : LeftId (↔) True (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_True : RightId (↔) True (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance False_and : LeftAbsorb (↔) False (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_False : RightAbsorb (↔) False (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance False_or : LeftId (↔) False (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_False : RightId (↔) False (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance True_or : LeftAbsorb (↔) True (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_True : RightAbsorb (↔) True (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance True_impl : LeftId (↔) True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance impl_True : RightAbsorb (↔) True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Notation "(∧)" := and (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∧.)" := (and A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∧ B )" := (λ A, A ∧ B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∨)" := or (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∨.)" := (or A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∨ B )" := (λ A, A ∨ B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(↔)" := iff (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ↔.)" := (iff A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.↔ B )" := (λ A, A ↔ B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ↔ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ↔ _) ⇒ symmetry; assumption : core.
Lemma or_l P Q : ¬Q → P ∨ Q ↔ P.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma or_r P Q : ¬P → P ∨ Q ↔ Q.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_l (P Q : Prop) : (Q → P) → Q → (P ∧ Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_r (P Q : Prop) : P → (P → Q) → (P ∧ Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma impl_transitive (P Q R : Prop) : (P → Q) → (Q → R) → (P → R).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma forall_proper {A} (P Q : A → Prop) :
(∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) → (∀ x, P x) ↔ (∀ x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Lemma exist_proper {A} (P Q : A → Prop) :
(∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) → (∃ x, P x) ↔ (∃ x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Global Instance eq_comm {A} : Comm (↔) (=@{A}).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance flip_eq_comm {A} : Comm (↔) (λ x y, y =@{A} x).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance iff_comm : Comm (↔) (↔).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_comm : Comm (↔) (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_assoc : Assoc (↔) (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_idemp : IdemP (↔) (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_comm : Comm (↔) (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_assoc : Assoc (↔) (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_idemp : IdemP (↔) (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance True_and : LeftId (↔) True (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_True : RightId (↔) True (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance False_and : LeftAbsorb (↔) False (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance and_False : RightAbsorb (↔) False (∧).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance False_or : LeftId (↔) False (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_False : RightId (↔) False (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance True_or : LeftAbsorb (↔) True (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance or_True : RightAbsorb (↔) True (∨).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance True_impl : LeftId (↔) True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance impl_True : RightAbsorb (↔) True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Notation "(→)" := (λ A B, A → B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A →.)" := (λ B, A → B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.→ B )" := (λ A, A → B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "t $ r" := (t r)
(at level 65, right associativity, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($)" := (λ f x, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.$ x )" := (λ f, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∘" := compose : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘)" := compose (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( f ∘.)" := (compose f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∘ f )" := (λ g, compose g f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Instance impl_inhabited {A} `{Inhabited B} : Inhabited (A → B) :=
populate (λ _, inhabitant).
Notation "( A →.)" := (λ B, A → B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.→ B )" := (λ A, A → B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "t $ r" := (t r)
(at level 65, right associativity, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($)" := (λ f x, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.$ x )" := (λ f, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∘" := compose : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘)" := compose (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( f ∘.)" := (compose f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∘ f )" := (λ g, compose g f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Instance impl_inhabited {A} `{Inhabited B} : Inhabited (A → B) :=
populate (λ _, inhabitant).
Global Arguments id _ _ / : assert.
Global Arguments compose _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Global Arguments flip _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Global Arguments const _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Typeclasses Transparent id compose flip const.
Definition fun_map {A A' B B'} (f: A' → A) (g: B → B') (h : A → B) : A' → B' :=
g ∘ h ∘ f.
Global Instance const_proper `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B} (x : B) :
Reflexive R2 → Proper (R1 ==> R2) (λ _, x).
Proof. intros ? y1 y2; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance id_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros ??; auto. Qed.
Global Instance compose_inj {A B C} R1 R2 R3 (f : A → B) (g : B → C) :
Inj R1 R2 f → Inj R2 R3 g → Inj R1 R3 (g ∘ f).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance id_surj {A} : Surj (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros y; ∃ y; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance compose_surj {A B C} R (f : A → B) (g : B → C) :
Surj (=) f → Surj R g → Surj R (g ∘ f).
Proof.
intros ?? x. unfold compose. destruct (surj g x) as [y ?].
destruct (surj f y) as [z ?]. ∃ z. congruence.
Qed.
Global Instance id_comm {A B} (x : B) : Comm (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance id_assoc {A} (x : A) : Assoc (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const1_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const2_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const1_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const2_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Arguments compose _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Global Arguments flip _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Global Arguments const _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Typeclasses Transparent id compose flip const.
Definition fun_map {A A' B B'} (f: A' → A) (g: B → B') (h : A → B) : A' → B' :=
g ∘ h ∘ f.
Global Instance const_proper `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B} (x : B) :
Reflexive R2 → Proper (R1 ==> R2) (λ _, x).
Proof. intros ? y1 y2; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance id_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros ??; auto. Qed.
Global Instance compose_inj {A B C} R1 R2 R3 (f : A → B) (g : B → C) :
Inj R1 R2 f → Inj R2 R3 g → Inj R1 R3 (g ∘ f).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Global Instance id_surj {A} : Surj (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros y; ∃ y; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance compose_surj {A B C} R (f : A → B) (g : B → C) :
Surj (=) f → Surj R g → Surj R (g ∘ f).
Proof.
intros ?? x. unfold compose. destruct (surj g x) as [y ?].
destruct (surj f y) as [z ?]. ∃ z. congruence.
Qed.
Global Instance id_comm {A B} (x : B) : Comm (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance id_assoc {A} (x : A) : Assoc (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const1_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const2_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const1_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance const2_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance list_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (list A) := populate [].
Definition zip_with {A B C} (f : A → B → C) : list A → list B → list C :=
fix go l1 l2 :=
match l1, l2 with x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 ⇒ f x1 x2 :: go l1 l2 | _ , _ ⇒ [] end.
Notation zip := (zip_with pair).
Definition zip_with {A B C} (f : A → B → C) : list A → list B → list C :=
fix go l1 l2 :=
match l1, l2 with x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 ⇒ f x1 x2 :: go l1 l2 | _ , _ ⇒ [] end.
Notation zip := (zip_with pair).
Coercion Is_true : bool >-> Sortclass.
Global Hint Unfold Is_true : core.
Global Hint Immediate Is_true_eq_left : core.
Global Hint Resolve orb_prop_intro andb_prop_intro : core.
Notation "(&&)" := andb (only parsing).
Notation "(||)" := orb (only parsing).
Infix "&&*" := (zip_with (&&)) (at level 40).
Infix "||*" := (zip_with (||)) (at level 50).
Global Instance bool_inhabated : Inhabited bool := populate true.
Definition bool_le (β1 β2 : bool) : Prop := negb β1 || β2.
Infix "=.>" := bool_le (at level 70).
Infix "=.>*" := (Forall2 bool_le) (at level 70).
Instance: PartialOrder bool_le.
Proof. repeat split; repeat intros [|]; compute; tauto. Qed.
Lemma andb_True b1 b2 : b1 && b2 ↔ b1 ∧ b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma orb_True b1 b2 : b1 || b2 ↔ b1 ∨ b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma negb_True b : negb b ↔ ¬b.
Proof. destruct b; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma Is_true_false (b : bool) : b = false → ¬b.
Proof. now intros → ?. Qed.
Global Hint Unfold Is_true : core.
Global Hint Immediate Is_true_eq_left : core.
Global Hint Resolve orb_prop_intro andb_prop_intro : core.
Notation "(&&)" := andb (only parsing).
Notation "(||)" := orb (only parsing).
Infix "&&*" := (zip_with (&&)) (at level 40).
Infix "||*" := (zip_with (||)) (at level 50).
Global Instance bool_inhabated : Inhabited bool := populate true.
Definition bool_le (β1 β2 : bool) : Prop := negb β1 || β2.
Infix "=.>" := bool_le (at level 70).
Infix "=.>*" := (Forall2 bool_le) (at level 70).
Instance: PartialOrder bool_le.
Proof. repeat split; repeat intros [|]; compute; tauto. Qed.
Lemma andb_True b1 b2 : b1 && b2 ↔ b1 ∧ b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma orb_True b1 b2 : b1 || b2 ↔ b1 ∨ b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma negb_True b : negb b ↔ ¬b.
Proof. destruct b; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma Is_true_false (b : bool) : b = false → ¬b.
Proof. now intros → ?. Qed.
Global Instance unit_equiv : Equiv unit := λ _ _, True.
Global Instance unit_equivalence : Equivalence (≡@{unit}).
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
Global Instance unit_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv unit.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance unit_inhabited: Inhabited unit := populate ().
Global Instance unit_equivalence : Equivalence (≡@{unit}).
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
Global Instance unit_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv unit.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance unit_inhabited: Inhabited unit := populate ().
Global Instance Empty_set_equiv : Equiv Empty_set := λ _ _, True.
Global Instance Empty_set_equivalence : Equivalence (≡@{Empty_set}).
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
Global Instance Empty_set_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv Empty_set.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance Empty_set_equivalence : Equivalence (≡@{Empty_set}).
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
Global Instance Empty_set_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv Empty_set.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
Notation "( x ,.)" := (pair x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(., y )" := (λ x, (x,y)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "p .1" := (fst p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .1").
Notation "p .2" := (snd p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .2").
Instance: Params (@pair) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@fst) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@snd) 2 := {}.
Notation curry := prod_curry.
Notation uncurry := prod_uncurry.
Definition curry3 {A B C D} (f : A → B → C → D) (p : A × B × C) : D :=
let '(a,b,c) := p in f a b c.
Definition curry4 {A B C D E} (f : A → B → C → D → E) (p : A × B × C × D) : E :=
let '(a,b,c,d) := p in f a b c d.
Definition uncurry3 {A B C D} (f : A × B × C → D) (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : D :=
f (a, b, c).
Definition uncurry4 {A B C D E} (f : A × B × C × D → E)
(a : A) (b : B) (c : C) (d : D) : E := f (a, b, c, d).
Definition prod_map {A A' B B'} (f: A → A') (g: B → B') (p : A × B) : A' × B' :=
(f (p.1), g (p.2)).
Global Arguments prod_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
Definition prod_zip {A A' A'' B B' B''} (f : A → A' → A'') (g : B → B' → B'')
(p : A × B) (q : A' × B') : A'' × B'' := (f (p.1) (q.1), g (p.2) (q.2)).
Global Arguments prod_zip {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ _ !_ !_ / : assert.
Global Instance prod_inhabited {A B} (iA : Inhabited A)
(iB : Inhabited B) : Inhabited (A × B) :=
match iA, iB with populate x, populate y ⇒ populate (x,y) end.
Global Instance pair_inj {A B} : Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@pair A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A → A') (g : B → B') :
Inj (=) (=) f → Inj (=) (=) g → Inj (=) (=) (prod_map f g).
Proof.
intros ?? [??] [??] ?; simpl in *; f_equal;
[apply (inj f)|apply (inj g)]; congruence.
Qed.
Definition prod_relation {A B} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) :
relation (A × B) := λ x y, R1 (x.1) (y.1) ∧ R2 (x.2) (y.2).
Section prod_relation.
Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
Global Instance prod_relation_refl :
Reflexive R1 → Reflexive R2 → Reflexive (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_relation_sym :
Symmetric R1 → Symmetric R2 → Symmetric (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_relation_trans :
Transitive R1 → Transitive R2 → Transitive (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_relation_equiv :
Equivalence R1 → Equivalence R2 → Equivalence (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
Global Instance pair_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> R2 ==> prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance pair_inj' : Inj2 R1 R2 (prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
Proof. inversion_clear 1; eauto. Qed.
Global Instance fst_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R1) fst.
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance snd_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R2) snd.
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
End prod_relation.
Global Instance prod_equiv `{Equiv A,Equiv B} : Equiv (A × B) := prod_relation (≡) (≡).
Global Instance pair_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} :
Proper ((≡) ==> (≡) ==> (≡)) (@pair A B) := _.
Global Instance pair_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj2 (≡) (≡) (≡) (@pair A B) := _.
Global Instance fst_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@fst A B) := _.
Global Instance snd_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@snd A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque prod_equiv.
Global Instance prod_leibniz `{LeibnizEquiv A, LeibnizEquiv B} : LeibnizEquiv (A × B).
Proof. intros [??] [??] [??]; f_equal; apply leibniz_equiv; auto. Qed.
Notation "(., y )" := (λ x, (x,y)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "p .1" := (fst p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .1").
Notation "p .2" := (snd p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .2").
Instance: Params (@pair) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@fst) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@snd) 2 := {}.
Notation curry := prod_curry.
Notation uncurry := prod_uncurry.
Definition curry3 {A B C D} (f : A → B → C → D) (p : A × B × C) : D :=
let '(a,b,c) := p in f a b c.
Definition curry4 {A B C D E} (f : A → B → C → D → E) (p : A × B × C × D) : E :=
let '(a,b,c,d) := p in f a b c d.
Definition uncurry3 {A B C D} (f : A × B × C → D) (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : D :=
f (a, b, c).
Definition uncurry4 {A B C D E} (f : A × B × C × D → E)
(a : A) (b : B) (c : C) (d : D) : E := f (a, b, c, d).
Definition prod_map {A A' B B'} (f: A → A') (g: B → B') (p : A × B) : A' × B' :=
(f (p.1), g (p.2)).
Global Arguments prod_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
Definition prod_zip {A A' A'' B B' B''} (f : A → A' → A'') (g : B → B' → B'')
(p : A × B) (q : A' × B') : A'' × B'' := (f (p.1) (q.1), g (p.2) (q.2)).
Global Arguments prod_zip {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ _ !_ !_ / : assert.
Global Instance prod_inhabited {A B} (iA : Inhabited A)
(iB : Inhabited B) : Inhabited (A × B) :=
match iA, iB with populate x, populate y ⇒ populate (x,y) end.
Global Instance pair_inj {A B} : Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@pair A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A → A') (g : B → B') :
Inj (=) (=) f → Inj (=) (=) g → Inj (=) (=) (prod_map f g).
Proof.
intros ?? [??] [??] ?; simpl in *; f_equal;
[apply (inj f)|apply (inj g)]; congruence.
Qed.
Definition prod_relation {A B} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) :
relation (A × B) := λ x y, R1 (x.1) (y.1) ∧ R2 (x.2) (y.2).
Section prod_relation.
Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
Global Instance prod_relation_refl :
Reflexive R1 → Reflexive R2 → Reflexive (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_relation_sym :
Symmetric R1 → Symmetric R2 → Symmetric (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_relation_trans :
Transitive R1 → Transitive R2 → Transitive (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance prod_relation_equiv :
Equivalence R1 → Equivalence R2 → Equivalence (prod_relation R1 R2).
Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
Global Instance pair_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> R2 ==> prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance pair_inj' : Inj2 R1 R2 (prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
Proof. inversion_clear 1; eauto. Qed.
Global Instance fst_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R1) fst.
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
Global Instance snd_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R2) snd.
Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
End prod_relation.
Global Instance prod_equiv `{Equiv A,Equiv B} : Equiv (A × B) := prod_relation (≡) (≡).
Global Instance pair_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} :
Proper ((≡) ==> (≡) ==> (≡)) (@pair A B) := _.
Global Instance pair_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj2 (≡) (≡) (≡) (@pair A B) := _.
Global Instance fst_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@fst A B) := _.
Global Instance snd_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@snd A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque prod_equiv.
Global Instance prod_leibniz `{LeibnizEquiv A, LeibnizEquiv B} : LeibnizEquiv (A × B).
Proof. intros [??] [??] [??]; f_equal; apply leibniz_equiv; auto. Qed.
Definition sum_map {A A' B B'} (f: A → A') (g: B → B') (xy : A + B) : A' + B' :=
match xy with inl x ⇒ inl (f x) | inr y ⇒ inr (g y) end.
Global Arguments sum_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
Global Instance sum_inhabited_l {A B} (iA : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
match iA with populate x ⇒ populate (inl x) end.
Global Instance sum_inhabited_r {A B} (iB : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
match iB with populate y ⇒ populate (inl y) end.
Global Instance inl_inj {A B} : Inj (=) (=) (@inl A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inr_inj {A B} : Inj (=) (=) (@inr A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance sum_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A → A') (g : B → B') :
Inj (=) (=) f → Inj (=) (=) g → Inj (=) (=) (sum_map f g).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?] [?|?] [=]; f_equal; apply (inj _); auto. Qed.
Inductive sum_relation {A B}
(R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) : relation (A + B) :=
| inl_related x1 x2 : R1 x1 x2 → sum_relation R1 R2 (inl x1) (inl x2)
| inr_related y1 y2 : R2 y1 y2 → sum_relation R1 R2 (inr y1) (inr y2).
Section sum_relation.
Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
Global Instance sum_relation_refl :
Reflexive R1 → Reflexive R2 → Reflexive (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?]; constructor; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance sum_relation_sym :
Symmetric R1 → Symmetric R2 → Symmetric (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. destruct 3; constructor; eauto. Qed.
Global Instance sum_relation_trans :
Transitive R1 → Transitive R2 → Transitive (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. destruct 3; inversion_clear 1; constructor; eauto. Qed.
Global Instance sum_relation_equiv :
Equivalence R1 → Equivalence R2 → Equivalence (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
Global Instance inl_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inr_proper' : Proper (R2 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inl_inj' : Inj R1 (sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inr_inj' : Inj R2 (sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
End sum_relation.
Global Instance sum_equiv `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Equiv (A + B) := sum_relation (≡) (≡).
Global Instance inl_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@inl A B) := _.
Global Instance inr_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@inr A B) := _.
Global Instance inl_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj (≡) (≡) (@inl A B) := _.
Global Instance inr_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj (≡) (≡) (@inr A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque sum_equiv.
match xy with inl x ⇒ inl (f x) | inr y ⇒ inr (g y) end.
Global Arguments sum_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
Global Instance sum_inhabited_l {A B} (iA : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
match iA with populate x ⇒ populate (inl x) end.
Global Instance sum_inhabited_r {A B} (iB : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
match iB with populate y ⇒ populate (inl y) end.
Global Instance inl_inj {A B} : Inj (=) (=) (@inl A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inr_inj {A B} : Inj (=) (=) (@inr A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance sum_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A → A') (g : B → B') :
Inj (=) (=) f → Inj (=) (=) g → Inj (=) (=) (sum_map f g).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?] [?|?] [=]; f_equal; apply (inj _); auto. Qed.
Inductive sum_relation {A B}
(R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) : relation (A + B) :=
| inl_related x1 x2 : R1 x1 x2 → sum_relation R1 R2 (inl x1) (inl x2)
| inr_related y1 y2 : R2 y1 y2 → sum_relation R1 R2 (inr y1) (inr y2).
Section sum_relation.
Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
Global Instance sum_relation_refl :
Reflexive R1 → Reflexive R2 → Reflexive (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?]; constructor; reflexivity. Qed.
Global Instance sum_relation_sym :
Symmetric R1 → Symmetric R2 → Symmetric (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. destruct 3; constructor; eauto. Qed.
Global Instance sum_relation_trans :
Transitive R1 → Transitive R2 → Transitive (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. destruct 3; inversion_clear 1; constructor; eauto. Qed.
Global Instance sum_relation_equiv :
Equivalence R1 → Equivalence R2 → Equivalence (sum_relation R1 R2).
Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
Global Instance inl_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inr_proper' : Proper (R2 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inl_inj' : Inj R1 (sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
Global Instance inr_inj' : Inj R2 (sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
End sum_relation.
Global Instance sum_equiv `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Equiv (A + B) := sum_relation (≡) (≡).
Global Instance inl_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@inl A B) := _.
Global Instance inr_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (@inr A B) := _.
Global Instance inl_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj (≡) (≡) (@inl A B) := _.
Global Instance inr_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj (≡) (≡) (@inr A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque sum_equiv.
Global Arguments existT {_ _} _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments projT1 {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments projT2 {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments exist {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments proj1_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments proj2_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Notation "x ↾ p" := (exist _ x p) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "` x" := (proj1_sig x) (at level 10, format "` x") : stdpp_scope.
Lemma proj1_sig_inj {A} (P : A → Prop) x (Px : P x) y (Py : P y) :
x↾Px = y↾Py → x = y.
Proof. injection 1; trivial. Qed.
Section sig_map.
Context `{P : A → Prop} `{Q : B → Prop} (f : A → B) (Hf : ∀ x, P x → Q (f x)).
Definition sig_map (x : sig P) : sig Q := f (`x) ↾ Hf _ (proj2_sig x).
Global Instance sig_map_inj:
(∀ x, ProofIrrel (P x)) → Inj (=) (=) f → Inj (=) (=) sig_map.
Proof.
intros ?? [x Hx] [y Hy]. injection 1. intros Hxy.
apply (inj f) in Hxy; subst. rewrite (proof_irrel _ Hy). auto.
Qed.
End sig_map.
Global Arguments sig_map _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
Definition proj1_ex {P : Prop} {Q : P → Prop} (p : ∃ x, Q x) : P :=
let '(ex_intro _ x _) := p in x.
Definition proj2_ex {P : Prop} {Q : P → Prop} (p : ∃ x, Q x) : Q (proj1_ex p) :=
let '(ex_intro _ x H) := p in H.
Global Arguments projT1 {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments projT2 {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments exist {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Global Arguments proj1_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Global Arguments proj2_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Notation "x ↾ p" := (exist _ x p) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "` x" := (proj1_sig x) (at level 10, format "` x") : stdpp_scope.
Lemma proj1_sig_inj {A} (P : A → Prop) x (Px : P x) y (Py : P y) :
x↾Px = y↾Py → x = y.
Proof. injection 1; trivial. Qed.
Section sig_map.
Context `{P : A → Prop} `{Q : B → Prop} (f : A → B) (Hf : ∀ x, P x → Q (f x)).
Definition sig_map (x : sig P) : sig Q := f (`x) ↾ Hf _ (proj2_sig x).
Global Instance sig_map_inj:
(∀ x, ProofIrrel (P x)) → Inj (=) (=) f → Inj (=) (=) sig_map.
Proof.
intros ?? [x Hx] [y Hy]. injection 1. intros Hxy.
apply (inj f) in Hxy; subst. rewrite (proof_irrel _ Hy). auto.
Qed.
End sig_map.
Global Arguments sig_map _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
Definition proj1_ex {P : Prop} {Q : P → Prop} (p : ∃ x, Q x) : P :=
let '(ex_intro _ x _) := p in x.
Definition proj2_ex {P : Prop} {Q : P → Prop} (p : ∃ x, Q x) : Q (proj1_ex p) :=
let '(ex_intro _ x H) := p in H.
Operations on sets
We define operational type classes for the traditional operations and relations on sets: the empty set ∅, the union (∪), intersection (∩), and difference (∖), the singleton {[_]}, the subset (⊆) and element of (∈) relation, and disjointess (##).
Class Empty A := empty: A.
Global Hint Mode Empty ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "∅" := empty (format "∅") : stdpp_scope.
Global Instance empty_inhabited `(Empty A) : Inhabited A := populate ∅.
Class Union A := union: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Union ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@union) 2 := {}.
Infix "∪" := union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪)" := union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∪.)" := (union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∪ x )" := (λ y, union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∪*" := (zip_with (∪)) (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪*)" := (zip_with (∪)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Definition union_list `{Empty A} `{Union A} : list A → A := fold_right (∪) ∅.
Global Arguments union_list _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
Notation "⋃ l" := (union_list l) (at level 20, format "⋃ l") : stdpp_scope.
Class DisjUnion A := disj_union: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode DisjUnion ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@disj_union) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊎" := disj_union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊎)" := disj_union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊎.)" := (disj_union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊎ x )" := (λ y, disj_union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Intersection A := intersection: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Intersection ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@intersection) 2 := {}.
Infix "∩" := intersection (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩)" := intersection (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∩.)" := (intersection x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∩ x )" := (λ y, intersection y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Difference A := difference: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Difference ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@difference) 2 := {}.
Infix "∖" := difference (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖)" := difference (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∖.)" := (difference x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∖ x )" := (λ y, difference y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∖*" := (zip_with (∖)) (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖*)" := (zip_with (∖)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Singleton A B := singleton: A → B.
Global Hint Mode Singleton - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@singleton) 3 := {}.
Notation "{[ x ]}" := (singleton x) (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "{[ x ; y ; .. ; z ]}" :=
(union .. (union (singleton x) (singleton y)) .. (singleton z))
(at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "{[ x , y ]}" := (singleton (x,y))
(at level 1, y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "{[ x , y , z ]}" := (singleton (x,y,z))
(at level 1, y at next level, z at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Class SubsetEq A := subseteq: relation A.
Global Hint Mode SubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@subseteq) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊆" := subseteq (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆)" := subseteq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊆.)" := (subseteq X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊆ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊆ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊈ Y" := (¬X ⊆ Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈)" := (λ X Y, X ⊈ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊈.)" := (λ Y, X ⊈ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊈ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊈ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆@{ A }" := (@subseteq A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆@{ A } )" := (@subseteq A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆*" := (Forall2 (⊆)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆*)" := (Forall2 (⊆)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ⊆ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ⊆* _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Infix "⊂" := (strict (⊆)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂)" := (strict (⊆)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊂.)" := (strict (⊆) X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊂ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊂ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊄ Y" := (¬X ⊂ Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄)" := (λ X Y, X ⊄ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊄.)" := (λ Y, X ⊄ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊄ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊄ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊂@{ A }" := (strict (⊆@{A})) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂@{ A } )" := (strict (⊆@{A})) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊆ Z" := (X ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊆ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊂ Z" := (X ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊂ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊆ Z" := (X ⊂ Y ∧ Y ⊆ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊂ Z" := (X ⊂ Y ∧ Y ⊂ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Definition option_to_set `{Singleton A C, Empty C} (mx : option A) : C :=
match mx with None ⇒ ∅ | Some x ⇒ {[ x ]} end.
Fixpoint list_to_set `{Singleton A C, Empty C, Union C} (l : list A) : C :=
match l with [] ⇒ ∅ | x :: l ⇒ {[ x ]} ∪ list_to_set l end.
Fixpoint list_to_set_disj `{Singleton A C, Empty C, DisjUnion C} (l : list A) : C :=
match l with [] ⇒ ∅ | x :: l ⇒ {[ x ]} ⊎ list_to_set_disj l end.
Global Hint Mode Empty ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "∅" := empty (format "∅") : stdpp_scope.
Global Instance empty_inhabited `(Empty A) : Inhabited A := populate ∅.
Class Union A := union: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Union ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@union) 2 := {}.
Infix "∪" := union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪)" := union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∪.)" := (union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∪ x )" := (λ y, union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∪*" := (zip_with (∪)) (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪*)" := (zip_with (∪)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Definition union_list `{Empty A} `{Union A} : list A → A := fold_right (∪) ∅.
Global Arguments union_list _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
Notation "⋃ l" := (union_list l) (at level 20, format "⋃ l") : stdpp_scope.
Class DisjUnion A := disj_union: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode DisjUnion ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@disj_union) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊎" := disj_union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊎)" := disj_union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊎.)" := (disj_union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊎ x )" := (λ y, disj_union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Intersection A := intersection: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Intersection ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@intersection) 2 := {}.
Infix "∩" := intersection (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩)" := intersection (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∩.)" := (intersection x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∩ x )" := (λ y, intersection y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Difference A := difference: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Difference ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@difference) 2 := {}.
Infix "∖" := difference (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖)" := difference (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∖.)" := (difference x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∖ x )" := (λ y, difference y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∖*" := (zip_with (∖)) (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖*)" := (zip_with (∖)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Singleton A B := singleton: A → B.
Global Hint Mode Singleton - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@singleton) 3 := {}.
Notation "{[ x ]}" := (singleton x) (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "{[ x ; y ; .. ; z ]}" :=
(union .. (union (singleton x) (singleton y)) .. (singleton z))
(at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "{[ x , y ]}" := (singleton (x,y))
(at level 1, y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "{[ x , y , z ]}" := (singleton (x,y,z))
(at level 1, y at next level, z at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Class SubsetEq A := subseteq: relation A.
Global Hint Mode SubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@subseteq) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊆" := subseteq (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆)" := subseteq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊆.)" := (subseteq X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊆ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊆ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊈ Y" := (¬X ⊆ Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈)" := (λ X Y, X ⊈ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊈.)" := (λ Y, X ⊈ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊈ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊈ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆@{ A }" := (@subseteq A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆@{ A } )" := (@subseteq A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆*" := (Forall2 (⊆)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆*)" := (Forall2 (⊆)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ⊆ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ⊆* _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Infix "⊂" := (strict (⊆)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂)" := (strict (⊆)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊂.)" := (strict (⊆) X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊂ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊂ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊄ Y" := (¬X ⊂ Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄)" := (λ X Y, X ⊄ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊄.)" := (λ Y, X ⊄ Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊄ X )" := (λ Y, Y ⊄ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊂@{ A }" := (strict (⊆@{A})) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂@{ A } )" := (strict (⊆@{A})) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊆ Z" := (X ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊆ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊂ Z" := (X ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊂ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊆ Z" := (X ⊂ Y ∧ Y ⊆ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊂ Z" := (X ⊂ Y ∧ Y ⊂ Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Definition option_to_set `{Singleton A C, Empty C} (mx : option A) : C :=
match mx with None ⇒ ∅ | Some x ⇒ {[ x ]} end.
Fixpoint list_to_set `{Singleton A C, Empty C, Union C} (l : list A) : C :=
match l with [] ⇒ ∅ | x :: l ⇒ {[ x ]} ∪ list_to_set l end.
Fixpoint list_to_set_disj `{Singleton A C, Empty C, DisjUnion C} (l : list A) : C :=
match l with [] ⇒ ∅ | x :: l ⇒ {[ x ]} ⊎ list_to_set_disj l end.
The class Lexico A is used for the lexicographic order on A. This order
is used to create finite maps, finite sets, etc, and is typically different from
the order (⊆).
Class Lexico A := lexico: relation A.
Global Hint Mode Lexico ! : typeclass_instances.
Class ElemOf A B := elem_of: A → B → Prop.
Global Hint Mode ElemOf - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@elem_of) 3 := {}.
Infix "∈" := elem_of (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈)" := elem_of (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∈.)" := (elem_of x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∈ X )" := (λ x, elem_of x X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ∉ X" := (¬x ∈ X) (at level 80) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉)" := (λ x X, x ∉ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∉.)" := (λ X, x ∉ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∉ X )" := (λ x, x ∉ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∈@{ B }" := (@elem_of _ B _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈@{ B } )" := (@elem_of _ B _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ∉@{ B } X" := (¬x ∈@{B} X) (at level 80, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉@{ B } )" := (λ x X, x ∉@{B} X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Disjoint A := disjoint : A → A → Prop.
Global Hint Mode Disjoint ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@disjoint) 2 := {}.
Infix "##" := disjoint (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##)" := disjoint (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ##.)" := (disjoint X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.## X )" := (λ Y, Y ## X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##@{ A }" := (@disjoint A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##@{ A } )" := (@disjoint A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##*" := (Forall2 (##)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##*)" := (Forall2 (##)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ## _) ⇒ symmetry; eassumption : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ##* _) ⇒ symmetry; eassumption : core.
Class Filter A B := filter: ∀ (P : A → Prop) `{∀ x, Decision (P x)}, B → B.
Global Hint Mode Filter - ! : typeclass_instances.
Class UpClose A B := up_close : A → B.
Global Hint Mode UpClose - ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "↑ x" := (up_close x) (at level 20, format "↑ x").
Global Hint Mode Lexico ! : typeclass_instances.
Class ElemOf A B := elem_of: A → B → Prop.
Global Hint Mode ElemOf - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@elem_of) 3 := {}.
Infix "∈" := elem_of (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈)" := elem_of (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∈.)" := (elem_of x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∈ X )" := (λ x, elem_of x X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ∉ X" := (¬x ∈ X) (at level 80) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉)" := (λ x X, x ∉ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∉.)" := (λ X, x ∉ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∉ X )" := (λ x, x ∉ X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∈@{ B }" := (@elem_of _ B _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈@{ B } )" := (@elem_of _ B _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ∉@{ B } X" := (¬x ∈@{B} X) (at level 80, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉@{ B } )" := (λ x X, x ∉@{B} X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Disjoint A := disjoint : A → A → Prop.
Global Hint Mode Disjoint ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@disjoint) 2 := {}.
Infix "##" := disjoint (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##)" := disjoint (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ##.)" := (disjoint X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.## X )" := (λ Y, Y ## X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##@{ A }" := (@disjoint A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##@{ A } )" := (@disjoint A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##*" := (Forall2 (##)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##*)" := (Forall2 (##)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ## _) ⇒ symmetry; eassumption : core.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ##* _) ⇒ symmetry; eassumption : core.
Class Filter A B := filter: ∀ (P : A → Prop) `{∀ x, Decision (P x)}, B → B.
Global Hint Mode Filter - ! : typeclass_instances.
Class UpClose A B := up_close : A → B.
Global Hint Mode UpClose - ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "↑ x" := (up_close x) (at level 20, format "↑ x").
Monadic operations
We define operational type classes for the monadic operations bind, join and fmap. We use these type classes merely for convenient overloading of notations and do not formalize any theory on monads (we do not even define a class with the monad laws).
Class MRet (M : Type → Type) := mret: ∀ {A}, A → M A.
Global Arguments mret {_ _ _} _ : assert.
Instance: Params (@mret) 3 := {}.
Class MBind (M : Type → Type) := mbind : ∀ {A B}, (A → M B) → M A → M B.
Global Arguments mbind {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@mbind) 4 := {}.
Class MJoin (M : Type → Type) := mjoin: ∀ {A}, M (M A) → M A.
Global Arguments mjoin {_ _ _} !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@mjoin) 3 := {}.
Class FMap (M : Type → Type) := fmap : ∀ {A B}, (A → B) → M A → M B.
Global Arguments fmap {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@fmap) 4 := {}.
Class OMap (M : Type → Type) := omap: ∀ {A B}, (A → option B) → M A → M B.
Global Arguments omap {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@omap) 4 := {}.
Notation "m ≫= f" := (mbind f m) (at level 60, right associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( m ≫=.)" := (λ f, mbind f m) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≫= f )" := (mbind f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≫=)" := (λ m f, mbind f m) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ← y ; z" := (y ≫= (λ x : _, z))
(at level 20, y at level 100, z at level 200, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "' x ← y ; z" := (y ≫= (λ x : _, z))
(at level 20, x pattern, y at level 100, z at level 200, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "<$>" := fmap (at level 61, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ;; z" := (x ≫= λ _, z)
(at level 100, z at level 200, only parsing, right associativity): stdpp_scope.
Notation "ps .*1" := (fmap (M:=list) fst ps)
(at level 2, left associativity, format "ps .*1").
Notation "ps .*2" := (fmap (M:=list) snd ps)
(at level 2, left associativity, format "ps .*2").
Class MGuard (M : Type → Type) :=
mguard: ∀ P {dec : Decision P} {A}, (P → M A) → M A.
Global Arguments mguard _ _ _ !_ _ _ / : assert.
Notation "'guard' P ; z" := (mguard P (λ _, z))
(at level 20, z at level 200, only parsing, right associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "'guard' P 'as' H ; z" := (mguard P (λ H, z))
(at level 20, z at level 200, only parsing, right associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Global Arguments mret {_ _ _} _ : assert.
Instance: Params (@mret) 3 := {}.
Class MBind (M : Type → Type) := mbind : ∀ {A B}, (A → M B) → M A → M B.
Global Arguments mbind {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@mbind) 4 := {}.
Class MJoin (M : Type → Type) := mjoin: ∀ {A}, M (M A) → M A.
Global Arguments mjoin {_ _ _} !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@mjoin) 3 := {}.
Class FMap (M : Type → Type) := fmap : ∀ {A B}, (A → B) → M A → M B.
Global Arguments fmap {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@fmap) 4 := {}.
Class OMap (M : Type → Type) := omap: ∀ {A B}, (A → option B) → M A → M B.
Global Arguments omap {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
Instance: Params (@omap) 4 := {}.
Notation "m ≫= f" := (mbind f m) (at level 60, right associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( m ≫=.)" := (λ f, mbind f m) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≫= f )" := (mbind f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≫=)" := (λ m f, mbind f m) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ← y ; z" := (y ≫= (λ x : _, z))
(at level 20, y at level 100, z at level 200, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "' x ← y ; z" := (y ≫= (λ x : _, z))
(at level 20, x pattern, y at level 100, z at level 200, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "<$>" := fmap (at level 61, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ;; z" := (x ≫= λ _, z)
(at level 100, z at level 200, only parsing, right associativity): stdpp_scope.
Notation "ps .*1" := (fmap (M:=list) fst ps)
(at level 2, left associativity, format "ps .*1").
Notation "ps .*2" := (fmap (M:=list) snd ps)
(at level 2, left associativity, format "ps .*2").
Class MGuard (M : Type → Type) :=
mguard: ∀ P {dec : Decision P} {A}, (P → M A) → M A.
Global Arguments mguard _ _ _ !_ _ _ / : assert.
Notation "'guard' P ; z" := (mguard P (λ _, z))
(at level 20, z at level 200, only parsing, right associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "'guard' P 'as' H ; z" := (mguard P (λ H, z))
(at level 20, z at level 200, only parsing, right associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Operations on maps
In this section we define operational type classes for the operations on maps. In the file fin_maps we will axiomatize finite maps. The function look up m !! k should yield the element at key k in m.
Class Lookup (K A M : Type) := lookup: K → M → option A.
Global Hint Mode Lookup - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@lookup) 4 := {}.
Notation "m !! i" := (lookup i m) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(!!)" := lookup (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( m !!.)" := (λ i, m !! i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.!! i )" := (lookup i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Arguments lookup _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Global Hint Mode Lookup - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@lookup) 4 := {}.
Notation "m !! i" := (lookup i m) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(!!)" := lookup (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( m !!.)" := (λ i, m !! i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.!! i )" := (lookup i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Arguments lookup _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The function lookup_total should be the total over-approximation
of the partial lookup function.
Class LookupTotal (K A M : Type) := lookup_total : K → M → A.
Global Hint Mode LookupTotal - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@lookup_total) 4 := {}.
Notation "m !!! i" := (lookup_total i m) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(!!!)" := lookup_total (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( m !!!.)" := (λ i, m !!! i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.!!! i )" := (lookup_total i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Arguments lookup_total _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Global Hint Mode LookupTotal - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@lookup_total) 4 := {}.
Notation "m !!! i" := (lookup_total i m) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(!!!)" := lookup_total (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( m !!!.)" := (λ i, m !!! i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.!!! i )" := (lookup_total i) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Arguments lookup_total _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The singleton map
Class SingletonM K A M := singletonM: K → A → M.
Global Hint Mode SingletonM - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@singletonM) 5 := {}.
Notation "{[ k := a ]}" := (singletonM k a) (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Mode SingletonM - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@singletonM) 5 := {}.
Notation "{[ k := a ]}" := (singletonM k a) (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
The function insert <[k:=a]>m should update the element at key k with
value a in m.
Class Insert (K A M : Type) := insert: K → A → M → M.
Global Hint Mode Insert - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@insert) 5 := {}.
Notation "<[ k := a ]>" := (insert k a)
(at level 5, right associativity, format "<[ k := a ]>") : stdpp_scope.
Global Arguments insert _ _ _ _ !_ _ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Global Hint Mode Insert - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@insert) 5 := {}.
Notation "<[ k := a ]>" := (insert k a)
(at level 5, right associativity, format "<[ k := a ]>") : stdpp_scope.
Global Arguments insert _ _ _ _ !_ _ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The function delete delete k m should delete the value at key k in
m. If the key k is not a member of m, the original map should be
returned.
Class Delete (K M : Type) := delete: K → M → M.
Global Hint Mode Delete - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@delete) 4 := {}.
Global Arguments delete _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Global Hint Mode Delete - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@delete) 4 := {}.
Global Arguments delete _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The function alter f k m should update the value at key k using the
function f, which is called with the original value.
Class Alter (K A M : Type) := alter: (A → A) → K → M → M.
Global Hint Mode Alter - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@alter) 5 := {}.
Global Arguments alter {_ _ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Global Hint Mode Alter - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@alter) 5 := {}.
Global Arguments alter {_ _ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The function partial_alter f k m should update the value at key k using the
function f, which is called with the original value at key k or None
if k is not a member of m. The value at k should be deleted if f
yields None.
Class PartialAlter (K A M : Type) :=
partial_alter: (option A → option A) → K → M → M.
Global Hint Mode PartialAlter - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@partial_alter) 4 := {}.
Global Arguments partial_alter _ _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
partial_alter: (option A → option A) → K → M → M.
Global Hint Mode PartialAlter - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@partial_alter) 4 := {}.
Global Arguments partial_alter _ _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The function dom C m should yield the domain of m. That is a finite
set of type C that contains the keys that are a member of m.
Class Dom (M C : Type) := dom: M → C.
Global Hint Mode Dom ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@dom) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments dom : clear implicits.
Global Arguments dom {_} _ {_} !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Global Hint Mode Dom ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@dom) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments dom : clear implicits.
Global Arguments dom {_} _ {_} !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The function merge f m1 m2 should merge the maps m1 and m2 by
constructing a new map whose value at key k is f (m1 !! k) (m2 !! k).
Class Merge (M : Type → Type) :=
merge: ∀ {A B C}, (option A → option B → option C) → M A → M B → M C.
Global Hint Mode Merge ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@merge) 4 := {}.
Global Arguments merge _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
merge: ∀ {A B C}, (option A → option B → option C) → M A → M B → M C.
Global Hint Mode Merge ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@merge) 4 := {}.
Global Arguments merge _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
The function union_with f m1 m2 is supposed to yield the union of m1
and m2 using the function f to combine values of members that are in
both m1 and m2.
Class UnionWith (A M : Type) :=
union_with: (A → A → option A) → M → M → M.
Global Hint Mode UnionWith - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@union_with) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments union_with {_ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
union_with: (A → A → option A) → M → M → M.
Global Hint Mode UnionWith - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@union_with) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments union_with {_ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Similarly for intersection and difference.
Class IntersectionWith (A M : Type) :=
intersection_with: (A → A → option A) → M → M → M.
Global Hint Mode IntersectionWith - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@intersection_with) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments intersection_with {_ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Class DifferenceWith (A M : Type) :=
difference_with: (A → A → option A) → M → M → M.
Global Hint Mode DifferenceWith - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@difference_with) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments difference_with {_ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Definition intersection_with_list `{IntersectionWith A M}
(f : A → A → option A) : M → list M → M := fold_right (intersection_with f).
Global Arguments intersection_with_list _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
intersection_with: (A → A → option A) → M → M → M.
Global Hint Mode IntersectionWith - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@intersection_with) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments intersection_with {_ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Class DifferenceWith (A M : Type) :=
difference_with: (A → A → option A) → M → M → M.
Global Hint Mode DifferenceWith - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@difference_with) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments difference_with {_ _ _} _ !_ !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Definition intersection_with_list `{IntersectionWith A M}
(f : A → A → option A) : M → list M → M := fold_right (intersection_with f).
Global Arguments intersection_with_list _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
Notations for lattices.
SqSubsetEq registers the "canonical" partial order for a type, and is used for the \sqsubseteq symbol.
Class SqSubsetEq A := sqsubseteq: relation A.
Global Hint Mode SqSubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@sqsubseteq) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊑" := sqsubseteq (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊑)" := sqsubseteq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊑.)" := (sqsubseteq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊑ y )" := (λ x, sqsubseteq x y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊑@{ A }" := (@sqsubseteq A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊑@{ A } )" := (@sqsubseteq A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Instance sqsubseteq_rewrite `{SqSubsetEq A} : RewriteRelation (⊑@{A}) := {}.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ⊑ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Class Meet A := meet: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Meet ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@meet) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊓" := meet (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊓)" := meet (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊓.)" := (meet x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊓ y )" := (λ x, meet x y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Join A := join: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Join ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@join) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊔" := join (at level 50) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊔)" := join (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊔.)" := (join x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊔ y )" := (λ x, join x y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Top A := top : A.
Global Hint Mode Top ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "⊤" := top (format "⊤") : stdpp_scope.
Class Bottom A := bottom : A.
Global Hint Mode Bottom ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "⊥" := bottom (format "⊥") : stdpp_scope.
Global Hint Mode SqSubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@sqsubseteq) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊑" := sqsubseteq (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊑)" := sqsubseteq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊑.)" := (sqsubseteq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊑ y )" := (λ x, sqsubseteq x y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊑@{ A }" := (@sqsubseteq A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊑@{ A } )" := (@sqsubseteq A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Global Instance sqsubseteq_rewrite `{SqSubsetEq A} : RewriteRelation (⊑@{A}) := {}.
Global Hint Extern 0 (_ ⊑ _) ⇒ reflexivity : core.
Class Meet A := meet: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Meet ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@meet) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊓" := meet (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊓)" := meet (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊓.)" := (meet x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊓ y )" := (λ x, meet x y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Join A := join: A → A → A.
Global Hint Mode Join ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@join) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊔" := join (at level 50) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊔)" := join (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ⊔.)" := (join x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊔ y )" := (λ x, join x y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Class Top A := top : A.
Global Hint Mode Top ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "⊤" := top (format "⊤") : stdpp_scope.
Class Bottom A := bottom : A.
Global Hint Mode Bottom ! : typeclass_instances.
Notation "⊥" := bottom (format "⊥") : stdpp_scope.
Axiomatization of sets
The classes SemiSet A C, Set_ A C, and TopSet A C axiomatize sets of type C with elements of type A. The first class, SemiSet does not include intersection and difference. It is useful for the case of lists, where decidable equality is needed to implement intersection and difference, but not union.
Class SemiSet A C `{ElemOf A C,
Empty C, Singleton A C, Union C} : Prop := {
not_elem_of_empty (x : A) : x ∉@{C} ∅;
elem_of_singleton (x y : A) : x ∈@{C} {[ y ]} ↔ x = y;
elem_of_union (X Y : C) (x : A) : x ∈ X ∪ Y ↔ x ∈ X ∨ x ∈ Y
}.
Class Set_ A C `{ElemOf A C, Empty C, Singleton A C,
Union C, Intersection C, Difference C} : Prop := {
set_semi_set :> SemiSet A C;
elem_of_intersection (X Y : C) (x : A) : x ∈ X ∩ Y ↔ x ∈ X ∧ x ∈ Y;
elem_of_difference (X Y : C) (x : A) : x ∈ X ∖ Y ↔ x ∈ X ∧ x ∉ Y
}.
Class TopSet A C `{ElemOf A C, Empty C, Top C, Singleton A C,
Union C, Intersection C, Difference C} : Prop := {
top_set_set :> Set_ A C;
elem_of_top' (x : A) : x ∈@{C} ⊤;
}.
Empty C, Singleton A C, Union C} : Prop := {
not_elem_of_empty (x : A) : x ∉@{C} ∅;
elem_of_singleton (x y : A) : x ∈@{C} {[ y ]} ↔ x = y;
elem_of_union (X Y : C) (x : A) : x ∈ X ∪ Y ↔ x ∈ X ∨ x ∈ Y
}.
Class Set_ A C `{ElemOf A C, Empty C, Singleton A C,
Union C, Intersection C, Difference C} : Prop := {
set_semi_set :> SemiSet A C;
elem_of_intersection (X Y : C) (x : A) : x ∈ X ∩ Y ↔ x ∈ X ∧ x ∈ Y;
elem_of_difference (X Y : C) (x : A) : x ∈ X ∖ Y ↔ x ∈ X ∧ x ∉ Y
}.
Class TopSet A C `{ElemOf A C, Empty C, Top C, Singleton A C,
Union C, Intersection C, Difference C} : Prop := {
top_set_set :> Set_ A C;
elem_of_top' (x : A) : x ∈@{C} ⊤;
}.
We axiomative a finite set as a set whose elements can be
enumerated as a list. These elements, given by the elements function, may be
in any order and should not contain duplicates.
Class Elements A C := elements: C → list A.
Global Hint Mode Elements - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@elements) 3 := {}.
Global Hint Mode Elements - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@elements) 3 := {}.
Inductive elem_of_list {A} : ElemOf A (list A) :=
| elem_of_list_here (x : A) l : x ∈ x :: l
| elem_of_list_further (x y : A) l : x ∈ l → x ∈ y :: l.
Existing Instance elem_of_list.
Lemma elem_of_list_In {A} (l : list A) x : x ∈ l ↔ In x l.
Proof.
split.
- induction 1; simpl; auto.
- induction l; destruct 1; subst; constructor; auto.
Qed.
Inductive NoDup {A} : list A → Prop :=
| NoDup_nil_2 : NoDup []
| NoDup_cons_2 x l : x ∉ l → NoDup l → NoDup (x :: l).
Lemma NoDup_ListNoDup {A} (l : list A) : NoDup l ↔ List.NoDup l.
Proof.
split.
- induction 1; constructor; rewrite <-?elem_of_list_In; auto.
- induction 1; constructor; rewrite ?elem_of_list_In; auto.
Qed.
| elem_of_list_here (x : A) l : x ∈ x :: l
| elem_of_list_further (x y : A) l : x ∈ l → x ∈ y :: l.
Existing Instance elem_of_list.
Lemma elem_of_list_In {A} (l : list A) x : x ∈ l ↔ In x l.
Proof.
split.
- induction 1; simpl; auto.
- induction l; destruct 1; subst; constructor; auto.
Qed.
Inductive NoDup {A} : list A → Prop :=
| NoDup_nil_2 : NoDup []
| NoDup_cons_2 x l : x ∉ l → NoDup l → NoDup (x :: l).
Lemma NoDup_ListNoDup {A} (l : list A) : NoDup l ↔ List.NoDup l.
Proof.
split.
- induction 1; constructor; rewrite <-?elem_of_list_In; auto.
- induction 1; constructor; rewrite ?elem_of_list_In; auto.
Qed.
Decidability of equality of the carrier set is admissible, but we add it
anyway so as to avoid cycles in type class search.
Class FinSet A C `{ElemOf A C, Empty C, Singleton A C, Union C,
Intersection C, Difference C, Elements A C, EqDecision A} : Prop := {
fin_set_set :> Set_ A C;
elem_of_elements (X : C) x : x ∈ elements X ↔ x ∈ X;
NoDup_elements (X : C) : NoDup (elements X)
}.
Class Size C := size: C → nat.
Global Hint Mode Size ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments size {_ _} !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Instance: Params (@size) 2 := {}.
Intersection C, Difference C, Elements A C, EqDecision A} : Prop := {
fin_set_set :> Set_ A C;
elem_of_elements (X : C) x : x ∈ elements X ↔ x ∈ X;
NoDup_elements (X : C) : NoDup (elements X)
}.
Class Size C := size: C → nat.
Global Hint Mode Size ! : typeclass_instances.
Global Arguments size {_ _} !_ / : simpl nomatch, assert.
Instance: Params (@size) 2 := {}.
The class MonadSet M axiomatizes a type constructor M that can be
used to construct a set M A with elements of type A. The advantage
of this class, compared to Set_, is that it also axiomatizes the
the monadic operations. The disadvantage, is that not many inhabits are
possible (we will only provide an inhabitant using unordered lists without
duplicates). More interesting implementations typically need
decidable equality, or a total order on the elements, which do not fit
in a type constructor of type Type → Type.
Class MonadSet M `{∀ A, ElemOf A (M A),
∀ A, Empty (M A), ∀ A, Singleton A (M A), ∀ A, Union (M A),
!MBind M, !MRet M, !FMap M, !MJoin M} : Prop := {
monad_set_semi_set A :> SemiSet A (M A);
elem_of_bind {A B} (f : A → M B) (X : M A) (x : B) :
x ∈ X ≫= f ↔ ∃ y, x ∈ f y ∧ y ∈ X;
elem_of_ret {A} (x y : A) : x ∈@{M A} mret y ↔ x = y;
elem_of_fmap {A B} (f : A → B) (X : M A) (x : B) :
x ∈ f <$> X ↔ ∃ y, x = f y ∧ y ∈ X;
elem_of_join {A} (X : M (M A)) (x : A) :
x ∈ mjoin X ↔ ∃ Y : M A, x ∈ Y ∧ Y ∈ X
}.
∀ A, Empty (M A), ∀ A, Singleton A (M A), ∀ A, Union (M A),
!MBind M, !MRet M, !FMap M, !MJoin M} : Prop := {
monad_set_semi_set A :> SemiSet A (M A);
elem_of_bind {A B} (f : A → M B) (X : M A) (x : B) :
x ∈ X ≫= f ↔ ∃ y, x ∈ f y ∧ y ∈ X;
elem_of_ret {A} (x y : A) : x ∈@{M A} mret y ↔ x = y;
elem_of_fmap {A B} (f : A → B) (X : M A) (x : B) :
x ∈ f <$> X ↔ ∃ y, x = f y ∧ y ∈ X;
elem_of_join {A} (X : M (M A)) (x : A) :
x ∈ mjoin X ↔ ∃ Y : M A, x ∈ Y ∧ Y ∈ X
}.
The Infinite A class axiomatizes types A with infinitely many elements.
It contains a function fresh : list A → A that given a list xs gives an
element fresh xs ∉ xs.
We do not directly make fresh a field of the Infinite class, but use a
separate operational type class Fresh for it. That way we can overload fresh
to pick fresh elements from other data structure like sets. See the file
fin_sets, where we define fresh : C → A for any finite set implementation
FinSet C A.
Note: we require fresh to respect permutations, which is needed to define the
aforementioned fresh function on finite sets that respects set equality.
Instead of instantiating Infinite directly, consider using max_infinite or
inj_infinite from the infinite module.
Class Fresh A C := fresh: C → A.
Global Hint Mode Fresh - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@fresh) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments fresh : simpl never.
Class Infinite A := {
infinite_fresh :> Fresh A (list A);
infinite_is_fresh (xs : list A) : fresh xs ∉ xs;
infinite_fresh_Permutation :> Proper (@Permutation A ==> (=)) fresh;
}.
Global Arguments infinite_fresh : simpl never.
Global Hint Mode Fresh - ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@fresh) 3 := {}.
Global Arguments fresh : simpl never.
Class Infinite A := {
infinite_fresh :> Fresh A (list A);
infinite_is_fresh (xs : list A) : fresh xs ∉ xs;
infinite_fresh_Permutation :> Proper (@Permutation A ==> (=)) fresh;
}.
Global Arguments infinite_fresh : simpl never.