Library iris.algebra.updates

From iris.algebra Require Export cmra.
From iris.prelude Require Import options.

Frame preserving updates

Definition cmra_updateP {A : cmra} (x : A) (P : A Prop) := n mz,
  ✓{n} (x ⋅? mz) y, P y ✓{n} (y ⋅? mz).
Global Instance: Params (@cmra_updateP) 1 := {}.
Infix "~~>:" := cmra_updateP (at level 70).

Definition cmra_update {A : cmra} (x y : A) := n mz,
  ✓{n} (x ⋅? mz) ✓{n} (y ⋅? mz).
Infix "~~>" := cmra_update (at level 70).
Global Instance: Params (@cmra_update) 1 := {}.

Section updates.
Context {A : cmra}.
Implicit Types x y : A.

Global Instance cmra_updateP_proper :
  Proper ((≡) ==> pointwise_relation _ iff ==> iff) (@cmra_updateP A).
  rewrite /pointwise_relation /cmra_updatePx x' Hx P P' HP;
    split⇒ ? n mz; setoid_subst; naive_solver.
Global Instance cmra_update_proper :
  Proper ((≡) ==> (≡) ==> iff) (@cmra_update A).
  rewrite /cmra_updatex x' Hx y y' Hy; split⇒ ? n mz ?; setoid_subst; auto.

Lemma cmra_update_updateP x y : x ~~> y x ~~>: (y =.).
Proof. splitHup n z ?; eauto. destruct (Hup n z) as (?&<-&?); auto. Qed.
Lemma cmra_updateP_id (P : A Prop) x : P x x ~~>: P.
Proof. intros ? n mz ?; eauto. Qed.
Lemma cmra_updateP_compose (P Q : A Prop) x :
  x ~~>: P ( y, P y y ~~>: Q) x ~~>: Q.
Proof. intros Hx Hy n mz ?. destruct (Hx n mz) as (y&?&?); naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma cmra_updateP_compose_l (Q : A Prop) x y : x ~~> y y ~~>: Q x ~~>: Q.
  rewrite cmra_update_updateP.
  intros; apply cmra_updateP_compose with (y =.); naive_solver.
Lemma cmra_updateP_weaken (P Q : A Prop) x :
  x ~~>: P ( y, P y Q y) x ~~>: Q.
Proof. eauto using cmra_updateP_compose, cmra_updateP_id. Qed.
Lemma cmra_update_exclusive `{!Exclusive x} y:
   y x ~~> y.
Proof. move=>??[z|]=>[/exclusiveN_l[]|_]. by apply cmra_valid_validN. Qed.

Updates form a preorder.
Global Instance cmra_update_rewrite_relation :
  RewriteRelation (@cmra_update A) := {}.
Global Instance cmra_update_preorder : PreOrder (@cmra_update A).
  - intros x. by apply cmra_update_updateP, cmra_updateP_id.
  - intros x y z. rewrite !cmra_update_updateP.
    eauto using cmra_updateP_compose with subst.
Global Instance cmra_update_proper_update :
  Proper (flip cmra_update ==> cmra_update ==> impl) (@cmra_update A).
  intros x1 x2 Hx y1 y2 Hy ?. etrans; [apply Hx|]. by etrans; [|apply Hy].
Global Instance cmra_update_flip_proper_update :
  Proper (cmra_update ==> flip cmra_update ==> flip impl) (@cmra_update A).
  intros x1 x2 Hx y1 y2 Hy ?. etrans; [apply Hx|]. by etrans; [|apply Hy].

Lemma cmra_updateP_op (P1 P2 Q : A Prop) x1 x2 :
  x1 ~~>: P1 x2 ~~>: P2 ( y1 y2, P1 y1 P2 y2 Q (y1 y2))
  x1 x2 ~~>: Q.
  intros Hx1 Hx2 Hy n mz ?.
  destruct (Hx1 n (Some (x2 ⋅? mz))) as (y1&?&?).
  { by rewrite /= -cmra_op_opM_assoc. }
  destruct (Hx2 n (Some (y1 ⋅? mz))) as (y2&?&?).
  { by rewrite /= -cmra_op_opM_assoc (comm _ x2) cmra_op_opM_assoc. }
   (y1 y2); split; last rewrite (comm _ y1) cmra_op_opM_assoc; auto.
Lemma cmra_updateP_op' (P1 P2 : A Prop) x1 x2 :
  x1 ~~>: P1 x2 ~~>: P2
  x1 x2 ~~>: λ y, y1 y2, y = y1 y2 P1 y1 P2 y2.
Proof. eauto 10 using cmra_updateP_op. Qed.
Lemma cmra_update_op x1 x2 y1 y2 : x1 ~~> y1 x2 ~~> y2 x1 x2 ~~> y1 y2.
  rewrite !cmra_update_updateP; eauto using cmra_updateP_op with congruence.

Global Instance cmra_update_op_proper :
  Proper (cmra_update ==> cmra_update ==> cmra_update) (op (A:=A)).
Proof. intros x1 x2 Hx y1 y2 Hy. by apply cmra_update_op. Qed.
Global Instance cmra_update_op_flip_proper :
  Proper (flip cmra_update ==> flip cmra_update ==> flip cmra_update) (op (A:=A)).
Proof. intros x1 x2 Hx y1 y2 Hy. by apply cmra_update_op. Qed.

Lemma cmra_update_op_l x y : x y ~~> x.
Proof. intros n mz. rewrite comm cmra_op_opM_assoc. apply cmra_validN_op_r. Qed.
Lemma cmra_update_op_r x y : x y ~~> y.
Proof. rewrite comm. apply cmra_update_op_l. Qed.

Lemma cmra_update_valid0 x y : (✓{0} x x ~~> y) x ~~> y.
  intros H n mz Hmz. apply H, Hmz.
  apply (cmra_validN_le n); last lia.
  destruct mz.
  - eapply cmra_validN_op_l, Hmz.
  - apply Hmz.

Frame preserving updates for total CMRAs

Section total_updates.
  Local Set Default Proof Using "Type*".
  Context `{CmraTotal A}.

  Lemma cmra_total_updateP x (P : A Prop) :
    x ~~>: P n z, ✓{n} (x z) y, P y ✓{n} (y z).
    splitHup; [intros n z; apply (Hup n (Some z))|].
    intros n [z|] ?; simpl; [by apply Hup|].
    destruct (Hup n (core x)) as (y&?&?); first by rewrite cmra_core_r.
    eauto using cmra_validN_op_l.
  Lemma cmra_total_update x y : x ~~> y n z, ✓{n} (x z) ✓{n} (y z).
  Proof. rewrite cmra_update_updateP cmra_total_updateP. naive_solver. Qed.

  Context `{CmraDiscrete A}.

  Lemma cmra_discrete_updateP (x : A) (P : A Prop) :
    x ~~>: P z, (x z) y, P y (y z).
    rewrite cmra_total_updateP; setoid_rewrite <-cmra_discrete_valid_iff.
    naive_solver eauto using O.
  Lemma cmra_discrete_update (x y : A) :
    x ~~> y z, (x z) (y z).
    rewrite cmra_total_update; setoid_rewrite <-cmra_discrete_valid_iff.
    naive_solver eauto using O.
End total_updates.
End updates.


Section cmra_transport.
  Context {A B : cmra} (H : A = B).
  Notation T := (cmra_transport H).
  Lemma cmra_transport_updateP (P : A Prop) (Q : B Prop) x :
    x ~~>: P ( y, P y Q (T y)) T x ~~>: Q.
  Proof. destruct H; eauto using cmra_updateP_weaken. Qed.
  Lemma cmra_transport_updateP' (P : A Prop) x :
    x ~~>: P T x ~~>: λ y, y', y = cmra_transport H y' P y'.
  Proof. eauto using cmra_transport_updateP. Qed.
End cmra_transport.


Section iso_cmra.
  Context {A B : cmra} (f : A B) (g : B A).

  Lemma iso_cmra_updateP (P : B Prop) (Q : A Prop) y
      (gf : x, g (f x) x)
      (g_op : y1 y2, g (y1 y2) g y1 g y2)
      (g_validN : n y, ✓{n} (g y) ✓{n} y) :
    y ~~>: P
    ( y', P y' Q (g y'))
    g y ~~>: Q.
    intros Hup Hx n mz Hmz.
    destruct (Hup n (f <$> mz)) as (y'&HPy'&Hy'%g_validN).
    { apply g_validN. destruct mz as [z|]; simpl in *; [|done].
      by rewrite g_op gf. }
     (g y'); split; [by eauto|].
    destruct mz as [z|]; simpl in *; [|done].
    revert Hy'. by rewrite g_op gf.

  Lemma iso_cmra_updateP' (P : B Prop) y
      (gf : x, g (f x) x)
      (g_op : y1 y2, g (y1 y2) g y1 g y2)
      (g_validN : n y, ✓{n} (g y) ✓{n} y) :
    y ~~>: P
    g y ~~>: λ x, y, x = g y P y.
  Proof. eauto using iso_cmra_updateP. Qed.
End iso_cmra.


Section prod.
  Context {A B : cmra}.
  Implicit Types x : A × B.

  Lemma prod_updateP P1 P2 (Q : A × B Prop) x :
    x.1 ~~>: P1 x.2 ~~>: P2 ( a b, P1 a P2 b Q (a,b)) x ~~>: Q.
    intros Hx1 Hx2 HP n mz [??]; simpl in ×.
    destruct (Hx1 n (fst <$> mz)) as (a&?&?); first by destruct mz.
    destruct (Hx2 n (snd <$> mz)) as (b&?&?); first by destruct mz.
     (a,b); repeat split; destruct mz; auto.
  Lemma prod_updateP' P1 P2 x :
    x.1 ~~>: P1 x.2 ~~>: P2 x ~~>: λ y, P1 (y.1) P2 (y.2).
  Proof. eauto using prod_updateP. Qed.
  Lemma prod_update x y : x.1 ~~> y.1 x.2 ~~> y.2 x ~~> y.
    rewrite !cmra_update_updateP.
    destruct x, y; eauto using prod_updateP with subst.
End prod.


Section option.
  Context {A : cmra}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.

  Lemma option_updateP (P : A Prop) (Q : option A Prop) x :
    x ~~>: P ( y, P y Q (Some y)) Some x ~~>: Q.
    intros Hx Hy; apply cmra_total_updatePn [y|] ?.
    { destruct (Hx n (Some y)) as (y'&?&?); auto. (Some y'); auto. }
    destruct (Hx n None) as (y'&?&?); rewrite ?cmra_core_r; auto.
    by (Some y'); auto.
  Lemma option_updateP' (P : A Prop) x :
    x ~~>: P Some x ~~>: from_option P False.
  Proof. eauto using option_updateP. Qed.
  Lemma option_update x y : x ~~> y Some x ~~> Some y.
  Proof. rewrite !cmra_update_updateP; eauto using option_updateP with subst. Qed.
End option.